Why Enterprises Need Blockchain: ICON PoS Token Economics
Why would an enterprise use Blockchain?
Blockchain saves costs. Smart contracts are inherently valuable.
“According to a Santander FinTech study, distributed ledger technology could reduce financial services infrastructure cost between US$15 billion and $20 billion per annum by 2022, providing the possibility to decommission legacy systems and infrastructure and significantly reduce IT costs.” -https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/media-centre/articles/blockchain-new-tool-to-cut-costs.html
Blockchain-based database systems could reduce costs and cut 70% on central finance reporting, 50% on business and central operations, 50% on compliance
And of course, since this report will focus on ICON as a leading enterprise solution, let’s take a look at this statistic, regarding their authentication solution, ChainID:
The service, which is referred to as “Chain ID,” allows customers to go through a user authentication procedure without any third party involved. The service is based on the blockchain platform developed by a consortium managed by Kofia. Besides its security advantages, Chain ID is anticipated to cut costs by about 90%, reducing them to 1/10th of what they are right now.
But what about the costs of implementing Blockchain?
Blockchain transactions have transaction fees, and these fees can add up over time. Why would an enterprise use this technology if there are fees that stack up, associated with using this network?
This is where we get to see the beauty of PoS token economics.
For well-designed PoS systems, the network will be free of recurring expenses for enterprises within the ecosystem, regardless of transaction fees. A good example of this is ICON, the leading Korean public-private blockchain ecosystem. In ICON’s ecosystem, the way this system will work is as follows:
Enterprises will buy enough ICX so that when they stake it, they will earn enough staking revenues to cover their transaction fees for the use period.
Through this, enterprises not only get free recurring access to a powerful enterprise blockchain ecosystem, but they also get:
an investment that can be moved or sold at any time on an extremely liquid market,
access to ICON DApps that may provide useful enterprise tools, and
access to Ethereum DApps through the decentralized exchange.
This also allows for enterprises to back out of using this system whenever they chose to as well by simply selling their stake, the only costs being the switching costs involved.
Narrowing down the blockchain network costs of an enterprise to only a lump – investment, enterprises can value the tradeoffs of using this network through a simple ROI (return on investment) calculation. As long as the blockchain network can provide them an acceptable level of return (through cost savings or other synergies), enterprise adoption can and will happen.
How PoS Token Economics Reward Enterprises
The following report examines the simple relationship between staking rewards and enterprise investment.
Activity rewarding PoS systems have better-aligned token-economic incentive structures than fixed rewards systems for everyone within the network. Further, if the price of transactions in USD remains static, the price appreciation of cryptocurrencies does not affect enterprise incentives.
PoS and the Enterprise
Simplified for the purposes of this report, the ICON network works as such:
Theloop, a for-profit consultancy, onboards enterprises onto private chains with technology similar to Hyperledger called Loopchain. The benefits of Loopchain over Hyperledger are that it has the ability to connect to a public channel using the ICON Nexus, allowing for cross-private chain interaction. If an enterprise within a consortium were to want to initiate a blockchain – based communication with another enterprise, Loopchain has a pre-built gateway for doing so. (Hyperledger will have this capability with the ethereum blockchain at a later date.)
The ICON nexus is a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) system where elected enterprises within individual consortiums are chosen as C-Reps to govern the economics of the public network (node addition & removal, voting rights, transaction fees and more). Because the ICON public network uses DPoS, a transaction fee must be paid in order to incentivize verification of network transactions – as of now, each ICON transaction costs 0.01 ICX ($0.013).
Enterprises that choose to use the ICON Nexus for communication between private chains would issue a bond to the reserve channel – a channel created to pass-down the rewards of staking ICX. After issuing this bond (staking ICX), the enterprise will receive ICX from the public treasury for its verification of network transactions, & it may use this ICX to pay for its own transaction fees.
Assumption for this model:
ICX earned through staking needs to equal ICX transaction fees for an enterprise so the enterprise can transact “freely”
Active & Passive Rewards
The reason why the ICON token-economic model was chosen for this report is because ICON has a variable staking rewards system. Nodes are categorized as either active on the network, or passive using the ICON Incentives Scoring System (IISS). This system uses a few variables to determine these categories;
Number of transactions
ICX staked in the treasury
With the IISS, active network users earn significantly higher staking revenues for active contribution to the public network. Generally, enterprises will be considered active users through IISS.
On the other hand, network hoarders that essentially remove currency from total supply are rewarded far less in staking incentives than their transacting counterparts – these hoarders are often speculators, so they do not specifically seek staking returns as an incentives – they simply seek investment returns, which can also be represented in price. While the exact staking revenue figures are yet to be witnessed, one thing is for certain:
Active network users earn higher staking revenues on the variable PoS ICON network than on other, non-variable rewards systems.
Some very rough estimates & calculations can be made which illustrate various implications for the future of this network:
Again, as the exact amount of incentives are unknown until the network has truly been put to use, only examples & estimates can be used for now. This research report will be updated once more concrete data is available.
Let’s examine this token economic incentive system from the example of Enterprise ABC. Enterprise ABC is a player who will transact through the ICON Nexus 1,000,000 times in a given year (roughly 2700 per day).
If active users earn 8% staking revenues within this system, and if Enterprise ABC requires $20,000 to transact in a given year, the investment into ICX can be calculated through a simple formula;
Investment Requirement = Annual Fees / Staking Rewards
Therefore, in an active system:
Investment Requirement = $20,000 / 8%
And in a non-variable PoS system:
Investment Requirement = $20,000 / 5%
Putting this all together,
Therefore, ICON’s active rewards incentive system, with the assumptions made above, Enterprise ABC would have to invest $250,000 to freely transact on the network, whereas in a standard, non-variable PoS rewards system, Enterprise ABC would have to invest $400,000.
User Profiles: Active & the Passive
The active user is an enterprise that would like to earn enough revenues to transact freely on the network. The main goal for this user would be maintaining the initial ICX quantity of the bond within the reserve, while covering transaction fees. Price appreciation is insignificant to this user – only a sweetener. The value this user wants is the value of the public blockchain network & its DApps. This is calculated through return on investment in the network.
Need: ICX rewards for transactions
The passive user, one with non-significant network usage, is categorized as a network hoarder (e.g.,typical investor). These users care only for the appreciation of their investment – and in the case of staking, appreciation can happen in two ways:
PoS rewards from staking
Token value appreciation
Need: Value Appreciation
Alignment of Incentives
As active users earn more rewards within the variable incentive system, the investment for value is always relatively lower than standard PoS systems.
I also present that the price appreciation of the ICON currency becomes insignificant for the next joining active user as long as the transaction costs in USD stay the same. Within the ICON ecosystem, transaction fees are controlled indefinitely by the elected C-reps, making this possible. While ICON prices appreciate, network users would have to invest the same amount of $USD, and while receiving a lower amount if $ICX, they would reap the same benefits. ICX price would appreciate with lump sum purchases, while network-joining incentives wouldn’t change for the next firm in line.
(Notice how in the example graphic, none of the variables are ICX price dependent – as long as USD remains constant, meaning transaction fees in ICX go down as ICX appreciates, incoming firms will not need to pay more to use this network)
For passive users, the network growing in terms of enterprise user adoption would increase the price of the ICX token, through large enterprise purchases of ICX. This is a great incentive for early passive investors.
At the same time, new enterprises would have the same incentives to join as the firms that joined prior due to static USD transaction fees.
More circulating supply would be locked up from staking as more active users buy large amounts of ICX on the market to stake in bonds. With simple supply & demand, the value of the token would increase.
Therefore, the active user receives non-changing positive incentives for staking in an active network, while the passive user receives non-changing positive incentives for being a network investor through investment price appreciation.
Additionally, as the ICON variable DPoS system provides better terms for active users (enterprises) than traditional PoS systems, the lower investment cost for a joining firm would incentivize network growth through adoption. This appreciates the $ICX token, also benefiting the passive user as well.
As more valuable DApps and platforms enter the market, enterprises will have more cost-saving technologies available to them. Specifically with PoS projects, electing for a variable DPoS system will make projects (like ICON) more valuable in the eyes of enterprises. At the same time, passive investors also benefit due to increasing adoption and passive staking revenues.